more

>>813
>>813
moooarrr

>>815

What is the location of that second photograph?

Hanging in Maynard Alley in front of Wah Mee.

CTOP...

Seattle PD shot of the blood pools on the floor of the Wah Mee after the bodies were removed.

>>1299

Your soul is worth the price of a pair of bolt cutters my friend.

More detail

Took this one a few weeks ago--again, in Pioneer Square, Seattle WA.

I do have more photos but I shall be starting a new thread to display them. Once you read the thread, you will understand why these particular shots belong in a separate thread.

this pleases me. thanks.

Also funny thing. If you look at OPs pic then go look at kowloon walled city on googlemaps/earth you will see all those surrounding buildings are all still there, albeit with plenty more trees!

Thanks. Finally picked up a copy and wasn't cheap.

On a related note, I need to see about getting my Zones of Exclusion scanned.

Impressive.

Those HDR shots are sickeningly rich, I wish people would stop using it. I reckon it makes the photo shit.

Those meandering asphalt streets look like they would be fun to skate on. Just skating through the city, depending on how rough the surfaces actually are, might need a long board of some description.

Imagine taking a helicopter ride over Tokyo at night. That would be the shit.

I've been twice, once in 2005, then again in 2008. The beauty of the city is so striking after living near London. And at night, if you find a good vantage point, you can watch the hundred aircraft warning lights slowly pulse above the street-lights and neon. I pretty much sat there with my DSLR for hours in total across my second stay. I know a little-known observation deck where you can look toward Tokyo Tower, across to Shinjuku, and then spin around and see the bay with the giant Ferris wheel's light-show floating above the reflections on the water. Immense.

>>1224
Hard to say, the pizza parlour is misleading. Bus looks familiar, though...Is it in Italy or America?

>>1224
Rome?

>>1260
almost. its the vatican.

>>1137

It does, but if you're at standard speeds(0-5000 m/s), you don't have to account for the change in force that a certain velocity has. You can find the actual equations in the Wikipedia page for Special Relativity.

However, energy does have a use for velocity. Simply put, the sum of the energies of an initial state is equal to the sum of the energies of a final state. An objects(non-relative) kineticl energy is .5mv^2=K, while the work done to slow/stop the plane is the integral of the Force in respect to the distance. Then you have some energy going into heat/other energies. So, assuming it starts with an initial v=0, and starts slowing at a distance d=0, you end up with(when simplified as [initial]=[final]:

.5mv(final)^2=integral(ma)+"lost energy"
(and remember, the acceleration is going to to need to be approximated by a function) From there, you can solve for the force(F=ma) the plane imposed on the building at a point.

Short answer: The speed generally doesn't matter in terms of Force(F=ma). It does with Energy though.

Also, if you want to be REALLY anal, you could use f=d(p)/dt=d(mv)/dt to account for the plane losing mass by either burning fuel or breaking up. It's commonly used for rockets going into the air.

By the way, the B-25 Empire State Building crash was also the place of the longest survived elevator fall recorded. Ironically, of an elevator operator which was already injured and transported in an elevator with damaged cabled :)

>>1107
New Amsterdam, New Amsterdam, a city so nice, they named it twice.

Even old New York
was once New Amsterdam

So we all become mindless slaves to some fat bitch who is a baby-factory? :p

>>1205
Oh Jesus, I'm going to have nightmares about that one.

>>1205
We already are. They're called 'wives'.