|
>>
|
No. 1686
>>1634
Wait, what? Racist?
I never used the phrase "because they were african", did I? Yes I made two sweeping generalisations but yelling racist when someone says what I did is facile. Where is your rebuttal?
Tribal conflict in africa is relatively common and the baddest bastards usually rise to the top. Ergo I said gangsters and conmen. Rhodesia and South Africa treated huge swathes of their population like dirt. Why? Because they could. Because they had and craved power. There is likely a myriad of abhorrent things they did that'll never come to the light of day. And I deplore such abuses of power let alone the mistreatment based solely on what someone was. Unfortunately many african governments do not seem to address the issue of corruption or do so without applying sufficient resources and so it continues. Men seek out the cracks in system in the lust for power. There is a stupidity in overconfidence. As to them being weak? Many are. Without a doubt. But it's not their fault. Deprivation of resources is a key issue among many others. Too weak to fend off tyrants? Yes. What would you do when a posse of armed men appear in your village with the intent to do whatever the hell they liked? Not alot when they're waving AK's about I'd wager. I wouldn't. I'd try to get away I think.
Now, don't get me wrong. I fully understand there are many africans that live in peace, that they live content, happy lives with only day to day worries to bother them. There are nature reserves and places of wonder. There are people as understanding as you or I and plenty capable of progressive, reasoned thinking.
tl;dr Rascist? I hope not.
|